Regents of the university of california v bakke essay writer

Excerpt from Term Paper: Regents of the University of California The so-called Bakke decision was the earliest in which the United States Supreme Court addressed affirmative action. The case certainly did not mean and end to the issues involved, and there have been several attempts to overturn the Bakke decision since.

Regents of the university of california v bakke essay writer

Excerpt from Term Paper: Regents of the University of California The so-called Bakke decision was the earliest in which the United States Supreme Court addressed affirmative action.

Regents of University of California vs. Bakke () Essays

The case certainly did not mean and end to the issues involved, and there have been several attempts to overturn the Bakke decision since.

It has been referred to as a reverse discrimination case, and it was of great import when it was decided in the late s after nearly a decade of affirmative action to bring more blacks and members of other minorities into the mainstream of work and academic life through programs of recruitment and special assistance to redress historical imbalances and discrimination.

The issue of affirmative action remains a difficult one for Americans to this day. Affirmative action is often characterized as a quota system, though quotas need not be part of affirmative action at all.

The Bakke case was an early challenge to affirmative action but did not end it by any means. Affirmative action is usually directed at correcting past discrimination against minority groups, usually black but also Hispanic groups.

It has also been used to correct discriminatory practices directed at women in education, the workplace, and elsewhere. In general, affirmative action is supported by liberals and the Democratic Party and opposed by conservatives and the Republican Party.

Minority groups tend to support affirmative action, though some leading black political leaders have opposed it, such as Ward Connerly in California. Educators also support affirmative action, seeing this as a way of assuring diversity and so of making the educational experience more valuable for everyone.

Many opponents have been like Bakke himself, whites who believe they have been the victims of reverse discrimination because positions that would have gone to them have instead been reserved for members of minority groups.

The decision in Regents of the University of California v. The first was the regular admissions program, complemented by the special admissions program, with the latter involving certain grade and scoring concessions in order to bring in more minority candidates.

Bakke was a white male who applied to Davis in and under the general admissions program. He was rejected in spite of having higher scores and grades than many minority applicants who were admitted.

He sued on the grounds that no person should be denied participation in any program receiving federal funding for reasons of race or color. The trial court found that the special program did operate as a racial quota and that the program violated the Federal and State Constitutions and Title VI.

The case was then taken to the U. Supreme Court, and Justice Powell wrote the majority opinion. Justice Powell found that the program at Davis included elements of special preference and stated that there are serious problems of justice connected with the idea of preference itself: Davis claimed that on several occasions the Court had approved preferential classifications without applying the most exact scrutiny.

However, Powell says that these cases in school desegregation, employment discrimination, and sex discrimination were materially different from the current case.

The school desegregation cases involved clearly determined constitutional violations; the employment discrimination cases involved direct discrimination by the respondent; and the sex discrimination cases are characterized by Powell as unlikely to result in the analytical and practical problems found in the type of preferential program under discussion.

Powell thus rejects the argument that there are precedents for this sort of case. Powell further concludes that selecting candidates strictly on the basis of race or ethnic origin "must be rejected not as insubstantial but as facially invalid" Regents of the University of California v.

Bakke and as forbidden by the Constitution. Powell also notes that the State does have a legitimate and substantial interest in eliminating the effects of discrimination, but the question is how is this to be accomplished: We have never approved a classification that aids persons perceived as members of relatively victimized groups at the expense of other innocent individuals in the absence of judicial, legislative, or administrative findings of constitutional or statutory violations Regents of the University of California v.

Cite This Term Paper:

Powell indeed finds that the setting aside of a certain number of positions for the preferred ethnic groups might contribute to the ethnic diversity sought.Excerpt from Term Paper: Bakke v. Regents of the University of California The so-called Bakke decision was the earliest in which the United States Supreme Court addressed affirmative kaja-net.com case certainly did not mean and end to the issues involved, and there have been several attempts to overturn the Bakke decision since.

Regents of the University of California V - Regents of the University of California V. Bakke Essay introduction. Bakke: Bakke: Allan Bakke was a thirty-five-year-old white man who had applied twice to the medical school at University Of California, Davis.

One of the Supreme Court cases that defined the application process is the University of California v. Bakke case. This was a case that was very controversial on both sides, and is still debated to this day.

regents of the university of california v bakke essay writer

It defined affirmative action, and by that it allowed certain minorities a better chance to 4/4(3). Introduction/Statement of Problem: Allan Bakke, a white student, applied to The Medical School of the University of California in both and , but was denied each time 5 / bakke v.

regents The case of Regents of University of California v. Bakke came up . (Brunner, p. 1) Allan Bakke sued the University in The case came to be called "Regents of the University of California v.

Regents of the University of California V - Regents of the University of California V. Bakke Essay introduction. Bakke: Bakke: Allan Bakke was a thirty-five-year-old white man who had applied twice to the medical school at University Of California, Davis. (Brunner, p. 1) Allan Bakke sued the University in The case came to be called "Regents of the University of California v. Bakke". The case traveled through the California courts, and then to the United States Supreme Court October 12th, /5(4). One of the Supreme Court cases that defined the application process is the University of California v. Bakke case. This was a case that was very controversial on both sides, and is still debated to this day. It defined affirmative action, and by that it allowed certain minorities a better chance to 4/4(3).

Bakke". The case traveled through the California courts, and then to the United States Supreme Court October 12th, /5(4). In a well-written essay, critically evaluate Justice Powell’s opinion in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke ().

Please use and refer to the edited.

Bakke V Regents Of The University Of California Term Paper - Words